MGT 302 MOD 2 CA Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

MGT 302 MOD 2 CA - Essay ExampleBased on the various explanations that the author has provided for each(prenominal) of these successful women, genius common aspect among both of these ladies is that each of them uses either one of the five hammers of power as explained by French and Raven (Changing Minds). Here in order to in effect(p)ly compare each of these successful ladies, the newspaper will detail their style and method adopted individually. This will provide a complete overview of each of their styles and will also provide a clear comparison of the styles adopted by each of them. individual(a) Analysis Here each individual will be analysed individually. This will help give a clear idea of the style used by the individual and will help grow a clearer difference among all the ladies. Sharon Patrick clearly uses the Coercive power as her mode of gaining real power in her work place. This she uses to gain the power and to also gain an upper hand when compared to her male c ounterparts. Sharon has shown the strength and authorisation that she has and has used this power to her benefit (Muoio). Linda Chavez-Thompson as well uses her coercive power to deal with her work place. Considering her grapheme this is an ideal power to use to keep in complete control in the work place. It is only essential to note here that her style is apt for her job. Linda Chavez-Thompson however does have a mixed type of coercive as well as expert power. She shows here expertise and used this to move up to the current position. Jessica Bibliowicz on the other hand, unlike the other ladies uses the reward power as her tool to gain the real power within the company (Brooks). This she believes is the silk hat method to create the work done and is her deep to success. Janice Gjertsen uses a combination of the legitimate and referent power. Her ideas are clear and unlike the others she focuses on being herself to best extent and to keep up the characteristics of a true wome n rather than trying to be someone else all together. Katherine DUrso unlike all the above mentioned ladies focuses on the legitimate power. She is clear with her goals and does not believe in inquire for help, but in doing things in the right manner from the beginning (Muoio). She follows rules and ensures that all the work in declivity with law. Michelle Bernard is a person who uses legitimate and referent power. She has had her goals and an aim set down firm and is clear in her mind of what she aims at achieving. Her style of leadership is more transactional in nature. Harriet Rubin follows the style of referent power. This proves to be effective as she works in an manufacturing which is led by men. She clearly adopts a transformational style for herself and tries to live herself to the market as that is the only sure shot manner of being a part of the industry and gaining a strong position in the company (Muoio). Kathryn Gould is among the few who follows a different approac h at the work place. She has adopted a charismatic leadership. She uses her natural charisma to reach out to the people and to get work completed. Her style of leadership is clearly very different from the rest. Sara Levinson has shown a very different form of leadership. She uses a participative leadership style and is focused on developing a strong team with the date of all. For instance here in this case of what type of leadership she uses, she consulted here team (Mullins). This is clearly a participative leadership style. Kathy Kane-Zweber uses a coercive form of leadership for her work