Utilitarianism on Terminating Employees versus Truthful Environmental Essay

Utilitarianism on Terminating Employees versus candid Environmental Reporting - Essay ExampleIt is evidently clear from the discussion that a rule useful might assert that the best rule is one that favors shareholder entertains in the long run which entails next government policies about emission levels because doing so protects the latters long-term interest. A company cannot come through and will not stay long without shareholders, so their happiness matters the most in this scenario. Furthermore, thinking about their interests can also satisfy the interests of workers for having lasting jobs, so this rule is not entirely bad for the interest of the many. However, shareholder happiness must not be based on temporary goal fulfillment but on long-term interests. John Stuart Mill asserts that the quality of happiness matters in making the repair decisions. He believes that humans are rational creatures who use higher faculties and nobler feelings to make the best decisions for their happiness. This case demands high-ranking thinking about the long-term good of shareholders which includes not breaking laws. If the author will not free the overcompensate and the environmental agency of the department finds out that the emission levels next year surpass the ratified limits, the government will close factory operations which will detrimentally affect shareholders and employees alike. The decision to break the report is important in ensuring that the company will follow policies on emissions levels and find the best engineering to comply with them. A rule utilitarian might suggest going ahead and publishing the report so that the company can prepare for buying the latest technology, even if it is expensive because it will hamper future problems that will harm shareholder interest more.